Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Sanders and Socialism; But Does he have a heart


No clarity exists in the inter-dependencies of democracy and human rights. This can also be true in the concepts of democracy and capitalism. If you think about these two systems separately it’s hard to see how these two systems can coexist in harmony.
Democracy is about the people; Capitalism is about winner takes all. This is why what Sanders is saying about communist countries has some merit.

Let’s look at the history of Nicaragua. When the Somoza dynasty started its rule in Nicaragua, and even though it was a military dictatorship, the US government backed the regime. During the Somoza regime there was no move towards democracy or human rights. How could a country that was instrumental in writing the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 support a government like that?

After the Sandinista revolution democracy and the realization of human rights, that both depend on citizens’ willingness to exercise personal responsibility, their desire to participate, and their sense of identity, made headways because Nicaraguan citizens participated. The result; the people made reforms in Nicaragua’s institutions and the economy resulting in significant gains in literacy, medical facilities, women’s rights, and human rights contrary to the prevalent believe that the better the democracy the better the human rights.

The pitfall in Nicaragua was not socialism, not communism, it was Ortega himself and his thirst for power. In his third run for presidency he political manipulated the election by suppressing his opposition and changing the constitution to allow the president to hold office which assured that Ortega can be president until 2021. Ortega also consolidated power within the Ortega family blurring a separation of powers. Sound familiar.

What happened in Nicaragua can happen in any country, democracy, communism, monarchy and in my opinion is happening here in the United States today. I pose the question to all of you, what is the connection between government and social wellbeing; between the government and the economy? I wonder if people are better off with a leader that has a heart no matter what system of government. What we need is someone who cares. As Ron Howard said in a recent blog post “A country cannot call itself civilized when its children, disabled, sick, and elderly are neglected.”

The United States has berated countries for their treatment of women, children, for working conditions, for torture, for legal and prison discrimination. What we need to as citizen’s is look inward to our own country that has only ratified only three of the nine core Un treaties.

Friday, February 21, 2020

Don't Pigeon Hole Me


Laurie Anderson’s message to young artist; Be loose. She goes on to say that the label of multimedia artist is meaningless. Hearing Laurie Anderson, someone I admire, gave me the freedom to make my blog diverse. Most blogs I read have a central theme, cooking

blog, food blog, travel blog but this isn’t me. I am someone diverse, someone who wants to tell stories, and there are all kinds of stories that take place in my life. Stories of people I admire that I want to share with you or my response to those stories. Consider this blog a rainbow of experiences.

I’ve heard Laurie Anderson describe her work as words and stories. She says the stories themselves aren’t as important as how they’re told. This is true for me too. It’s how words and images are gathered together to create a new vision. Laurie Anderson’s latest art installation Mohammed el Gharani: Habeas Corpus exemplifies the importance of how a story is told. Mohammed el Gharani was the youngest prisoner in Guantanamo and Laurie Anderson collaborates with him to tell his story in an exhibition at the Park Avenue Armory. Laurie captures Gharani’s prisoner persona of both being there and not being there at the same time. The exhibit gave Gharani a platform to tell his story in away that overwhelmed his audience. (if your interested in hearing about this exhibit here’s a YouTube to watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfuvAG_gXUM)

Bell Hooks, also affirmed that I can have a blog with stories on a range of topics. She talks in an interview about how people are framing her as a public intellectual. She doesn’t see herself as a public intellectual and she doesn’t want to spend time trying establish on how she sees herself as opposed to how other people try to define her. She explains that this would take her away from her tasks. It
would take her way from her work, and it’s the work that she wants to focus on. Mixing activism or politics with art and writing, people frame you as an activist in total. I see my writing as public art, with a private vision. I think if you read through my blog posts you will get a sense of consistent ideas in conversations that are rare, they are encounters that don’t necessarily happen every day.

I get inspired by a trip to a museum, watching the news, taking a walk in the forest, swimming in the ocean or doing political work and it’s these inspirations I want to write about, that’s the kind of thing I want to share. Other people frame me but the work I do does have a purpose but may not seem that way with just one read. I feel passionate about the intersection of ideas. No single outlook defines me, I’m a rainbow of inspirations. There is a refrain that holds my writing together and that defines it as my writing.
 
So, I ask you not to pigeon hole me or my blog as travel blog, political blog, feminist blog. Just enjoy the many forces in the world drawing me in from day to day. Our society wants to pigeon hole people because it helps people who want to get known to label themselves, to market themselves. I’m not here to market myself, I’m here to tell stories, to share experiences.

I do see my writing as an art. From journaling, to poetry, to storytelling, to essay, I try to create an ambience to convey a feeling that will surround you softly, or sometimes grab you and shake you into what I see as a reality, to get you enraged to stand up for something, or minimally to talk about it and maybe even write something yourselves.