The Democratic Party leaders are not happy with new
progressives. Finally, politicians at the national and local level address human
rights concerns, I let out a sigh of relief. Congresswomen Ilhan Omar and Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez took unpopular stands challenging the status quo of even the most
open-minded democrat, who responded to both of these women with harsh criticism. The field of Democratic presidential candidates
get more crowded every day, there may be a more progressive Democratic party in
the future. It’s important we support both of these women and the new members
of the Progressive Caucus.
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota questioned Elliot Abrams
about his past record on foreign policy in Central America. In this examination
of Abrams, Congresswoman Omar questioned the age-old United States foreign policy
that democracy at any price is a win. During
Abrams testimony before the House Foreign Affairs committee protesters on the
floor of congress yelled, “Don’t listen to this war criminal!” Congresswoman
Omar went down the list of Abram’s crimes in her opening comment. Crimes Abrams committed in his role in
Central America; supporting the Guatemalan Dictator General Efraín Ríos Montt who
ordered mass murder and torture of indigenous people in the 1980s; Ríos Montt
was later convicted of genocide; in 1991 Abrams pleaded guilty to two counts of
withholding information about his role in the Iran Contra Deal; Abrams can also
be linked to the 2002 coup in Venezuela that attempted to topple Hugo Chávez. I doubt these accomplishments of Abrams were on
his resume.
Congresswomen Omar questioned Abrams not only on his record
but on his assessment of his Latin American policies that he called “Fabulous.”
Abrams policy was to turn a blind eye on
acts genocide declaring these policies accomplished their goals of getting countries
in Central America to transition into democracies. I find it rare that in these kinds of hearings
for a federal appointed position that they never have to answer questions on
their work history, the mistakes they’ve made or the laws they’ve broken.
The US’s policy on promoting democracy is inundated with human
rights violations the world over. Congresswoman
Ilhan Omar questioning of Abrams brought Abrams credibility into question. Abrams
responded to these statements saying this is an attack on me and I’m not going
to answer. Congresswoman Omar kept
telling him “It’s not a question.” So,
if someone asks in a hearing for an appointee of the President of the United
States one can’t question their credibility because it’s considered an
attack? Abrams is not the first-person
Trump has appointed to office that has a shady past, there was Kavanaugh who
also took questions about his character as an attack when questioned about his
shady past.
Abrams hearing was for his appointment as the US’s Special Envoy
to Venezuela as the U.S. is starting to place sanctions on the state-run oil
company. Abrams is known for his right-wing hawk policies. Think back on your
job interviews, doesn’t the protentional employer have the right to ask you
anything they want about your past work experience and doesn’t mass murder
under your watch something an employer might want to know about. Something your responsible for particularly
if you never addressed the mass murders as a human rights violation.
I hear a lot about what Amazon is doing for the homeless population around what I call Bezos’ empire of South Lake Union. The fact is, with all the tax breaks given to Amazon social services suffer, Amazon just doesn’t make up the disparity that their tax breaks have created. The basic understanding of community development has changed over the years from community grass roots development to “Move in big business to create jobs in exchange of a tax breaks. This new development strategy doesn’t develop the resources of the existing community and the people who live there. I remember job training opportunities to aid local residents and industry that need new skill sets, or help to build small businesses, all of which develop local resources making existing communities stronger and build local economies.
It’s time that people in high positions in our government,
both local and national, are accountable for their actions past and present. That economic development focus on developing
the resources already in a community and include specific economic gain for
current residents. Governments at all levels should take on a human rights approach
at all cost. It's time that the United States on the federal level on down to
the municipal level start uphold human rights not just when it's beneficial or
as propaganda but from a caring thoughtful place of sincerity. All of this will contribute to a more human
community development strategy world wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment